Digital pedagogy and humanities increases “discoverability” across platforms.<\/p>\n
Education changes with technology so that it is\u00a0not just for the Academy, but bleeds across borders, becomes publically accessible.<\/p>\n
Increasing discoverability is a public good.<\/p>\n
We don’t form knowledge to hoard it.
\n{gift economy}<\/p>\n
Considerations:<\/em> Fear about changing the scholarship because we may not understand the new markers of success. Success is less well defined (and less elitist?).<\/p>\n Requires voice flexibility: how can you speak to both an informed and uninformed audience?<\/p>\n Is knowledge that is not public is not knowledge?<\/p>\n SO: what if we engage with the public not as masters, but as a form of inquiry? This is like being an artist, you make, you show, the critics speak, you respond…<\/p>\n The creative process: make a mark, sit back and look at it, see what else it has to say to you, make a responsive mark, show it, analyze publicly, make another piece, repeat forever. The process of engaging human faculties as a grown up.<\/p>\n Not knowing and offering mastery, but knowing and offering inquiry.<\/strong> cool idea.<\/p>\n ______<\/p>\n You publish not as master of all, but as author of your voice<\/strong>, and are reviewed \/ responded to like Greene Rausch–it becomes an exchange<\/p>\n call and response<\/p>\n change of established power structure (uh, this is radical)<\/p>\n not power over, but power within.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Digital pedagogy and humanities increases “discoverability” across platforms. Education changes with technology so that it is\u00a0not just for the Academy, but bleeds across borders, becomes publically accessible. Increasing discoverability is a public good. We don’t form knowledge to hoard it. {gift economy} Considerations: Traditionally, the more difficult it is to get into a journal, the […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11,24,13,5,45,44,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-55","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-collab","category-college","category-community","category-design-thinking","category-global-education","category-leadership","category-public-relations"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/nellruby.agnesscott.org\/thirdspace\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/nellruby.agnesscott.org\/thirdspace\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/nellruby.agnesscott.org\/thirdspace\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nellruby.agnesscott.org\/thirdspace\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nellruby.agnesscott.org\/thirdspace\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=55"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/nellruby.agnesscott.org\/thirdspace\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":59,"href":"https:\/\/nellruby.agnesscott.org\/thirdspace\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55\/revisions\/59"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/nellruby.agnesscott.org\/thirdspace\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=55"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nellruby.agnesscott.org\/thirdspace\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=55"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nellruby.agnesscott.org\/thirdspace\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=55"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\nTraditionally, the more difficult it is to get into a journal, the higher its perceived value. Is this funky? What does all access publication do to the jurying of knowledge?<\/p>\n